Now, without mentioning names, let me tell you about something that happened soem time ago.
A non-member, one of those loudmouths that BB shares my opinion on, managed to make a couple of "veteran" paid-up members from a specific area in Gauteng take their stuff and go. We haven't seen them on the forum since. They still ride passionately and do greet us should we run into another. But TB will not see them again. Ever.
I am talking about good people who contributed considerably to the campaign and its members. They were chased away by a loudmouth who got obnoxious with them and this loudmouth, who has never been a paid-up member, was not moderated or disciplined by the mods or the committee, in the interest of freedom of speech. Obviously that was a failing and the responsibility ultimately lies with the (elected) committee.
So we live and learn. Sometimes you have to decide on the lesser of two evils:
- p!sss off a non-member loudmouth who has some following but who will never join the campaign
- let freedom of speech reign regardless and take the risk of losing paid-up members and make sponsors worry about control
Believe me, I have served two full terms on the committee before as the born politican with the gift of the gab. We've been up and down this road before. Many times. So I do know what I'm talking about.
We believe in freedom of speech, but our responsiblity first and foremost, is to the campaign. If I have to choose between stepping on a loudmouth's toes and keeping it clean for the campaign, my decision will be made in the time it takes me to bat an eye.
But your point about transparency is obviously a very valif one and it is taken in the spirit that it is offered. The committee does not see itself as above criticism or advice.
As far as pointers on avatars are concerned, I think that would be over-engineering a simple issue.
If someone approaches the mods or committee about an avatar that seems dodgy, it will be considered. It does not have to be done in a heavy-handed way, but if the person gets tetchy about it, it might end unpleasantly. But such is life.
I see no problem with this advice at all. In a democracy the voters have the right to call their elected representatives to order, also between elections. I think the committee takes note of the concern.
